Fear God (UNDER CONSTRUCTION)

FEAR GOD

Revelation 14: 7 And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people, 7Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters. 8And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication. 8And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication. 9And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, 10The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: 11And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name. 12Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.

Ecclesiastes 12:13 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.14For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.

Universality and Cosmology

ANALYZING UNDERLYING IMPETUSES AS REFLECTED IN HISTORY (1840's-present)
Religion Civil Rights Science and Technology Space Forms of government Wars and conflicts
Crimes against humanity Literature Entertainment

Universitarianism reflected in religions, military, and politics. (1800's) III

Monday, November 22, 2010

Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche

Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) knew little of the 19th century philosopher Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855).[1][2] Georg Brandes, a Danish philosopher, wrote to Nietzsche in 1888 asking him to study the works of Kierkegaard, to which Nietzsche replied that he would.[3]
Recent research, however, suggests that Nietzsche was exposed to the works of Kierkegaard, through secondary literature. Aside from Brandes, Nietzsche owned and read a copy of Hans Lassen Martensen’s Christliche Ethik (1873) in which Martensen extensively quoted and wrote about Kierkegaard’s individualism in ethics and religion. Nietzsche also read Harald Høffding’s Psychologie in Umrissen auf Grundlage der Erfahrung (ed. 1887) which expounded and critiqued Kierkegaard’s psychology. Thomas Brobjer believes one of the works Nietzsche wrote about Kierkegaard is in Morgenröthe, which was partly written in response to Martensen's work. In one of the passages, Nietzsche wrote: Those moralists, on the other hand, who, following in the footsteps of Socrates, offer the individual a morality of self-control and temperance as a means to his own advantage, as his personal key to happiness, are the exceptions. Brobjer believes Kierkegaard is one of "those moralists".[4]
Both Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, considered precursors to existentialism (or existentialists themselves), criticized the rational, idealistic, and systematic structures of philosophy, writing instead on the importance of the individual and the self-affirmation of the individual's own values and beliefs. Both philosophers wrote in a fairly unsystematic way and with similar literary style.[1] They attacked what they saw as the detrimental effect of Christendom on the population. Both Kierkegaard and Nietzsche condemned Christian churches for perverting Christianity and straying from the values of Jesus. However, they differ in their view of whether religion can continue to play an important part in an individual's life. Kierkegaard believed that Christian belief and faith is a much more individualistic and personal experience, filled with dread and joy, than is afforded by the comfortable social gathering of Christendom, while Nietzsche believed Christians were attached to Christianity (which Nietzsche saw as a decadent religion) in order to compensate for their individual weaknesses.

Contents

[show]

[edit] Points of comparison

Throughout the 20th century (and into the 21st century), there have been growing studies of Kierkegaardian-Nietzschean comparisons. The most prominent early scholars who studied this aspect of the two philosophers include Georg Brandes, Karl Jaspers, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Karl Löwith.
J. Kellenberger in his work Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, identified major points of comparison:
  • The similarities of their lives, for example:
    • Kierkegaard's fiancée Regine Olsen and Nietzsche's companion Lou Andreas-Salomé
    • Intense writing periods where both authors turned out a book a year: (Kierkegaard: 1843-1850; Nietzsche 1878-1888)
  • Kierkegaard and Nietzsche's passion for life and philosophy
  • Kierkegaard's knight of faith and Nietzsche's Übermensch
  • Kierkegaard and Nietzsche's common focus on psychology (Kierkegaard's faith-based psychology - Nietzsche's power-based psychology)
  • Kierkegaard and Nietzsche's common focus on religion (Kierkegaard's embrace of religion - Nietzsche's rejection of religion)
  • Kierkegaard's writings on Abraham in Fear and Trembling and Nietzsche's character of Zarathustra in Thus Spoke Zarathustra
  • Kierkegaard's joyfulness of faith and Nietzsche's joyful acceptance of life
  • Kierkegaard's "crowd" and Nietzsche's "herd"

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  • Either Kierkegaard/or Nietzsche: Moral Philosophy in a New Key by Tom P. Angier (Ashgate Publishing, 2006).
  • Four Prophets of our Destiny: Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Kafka by William Hubben (Textbook, 2003).
  • Kierkegaard and Nietzsche by J. Kellenberger (St. Martin's Press Inc, 1997).
  • Notes and Discussions: Nietzsche's Knowledge of Kierkegaard by Thomas H. Brobjer. Journal of the History of Philosophy - Volume 41, Number 2, April 2003, pp. 251-263
  • Reason and Existenz by Karl Jaspers (Marquette University Press, 1996, ISBN 0-87462-611-0).

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ a b Angier, Tom P. Either Kierkegaard/or Nietzsche: Moral Philosophy in a New Key. ISBN 0754654745
  2. ^ Hubben, William. Dostoevsky, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Kafka. ISBN 0684825899
  3. ^ Nietzsche Chronicle: 1888
  4. ^ Journal of the History of Philosophy

By Years

1833 (1) 1836 (1) 1844 (11) 1848 (3) 1850 (2) 1862 (1) 1863 (1) 1866 (1) 1867 (1) 1898 (1) 1932 (2) 1935 (1) 1938 (3) 1939 (1) 1947 (2) 1950 (1) 1958 (1) 1960 (1) 1961 (1) 1962 (1) 1964 (6) 1965 (1) 1966 (2) 1967 (2) 1968 (1) 1969 (1) 1972 (1) 1973 (1) 1976 (1) 1977 (3) 1978 (2) 1979 (15) 1980 (2) 1981 (9) 1982 (3) 1984 (1) 1986 (1) 1989 (6) 1990 (17) 1991 (10) 1992 (4) 1993 (15) 1994 (4) 1997 (2) 1999 (3) 2001 (3) 2002 (4) 2003 (2)

Search This Blog