Murderers

Supporting War against the prosecution on two fronts, and lying against me to do. 1990 to present.
Overseas threats......................of prosecution

World IPv6 Day (numerical symbolisms)

World IPv6 Day

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  (Redirected from World ipv6 day)

World IPv6 Day is an event sponsored and organized by the Internet Society and several large content providers to test public IPv6 deployment.^[1] It started at 00:00 UTC on June 8, 2011 and will end 23:59 the same day.^[2] The main motivation for the event is to evaluate the real world effects of the IPv6 brokenness seen by various synthetic tests. To this end, during World IPv6 Day major web companies and other industry players have enabled IPv6 on their main websites for 24 hours. The goal is to motivate organizations across the industry – Internet service providers, hardware makers, operating system vendors and web companies – to prepare their services for IPv6 to ensure a successful transition as IPv4 address space runs out.^[3]
The test primarily consists of websites publishing AAAA records, allowing IPv6 capable hosts to connect using IPv6. Although Internet service providers (ISP) have been encouraged to participate, they are not expected to deploy anything active on that day, just increase their readiness to handle support issues.
Many companies and organisations have committed to participating in the experiment, including the largest search engines, social networking websites and internet backbone & content distribution networks.^[4]

[edit] References

1. ^ "About World IPv6 Day".
2. ^ "World IPv6 Day - How to Participate". Internet Society. Retrieved 26 January 2011.
3. ^ "Corporate reasons to move to IPv6".
4. ^ "World IPv6 Day - List of Participants". Internet Society. Retrieved 6 February 2011.

[edit] External links

• Official website

This computer networking article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

View page ratings

Rate this page

What's this?

Trustworthy

Objective

Complete

Well-written

I am highly knowledgeable about this topic (optional)

Categories: Computer network stubs | IPv6

War Powers Resolution [consent of congress]

War Powers Resolution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"War Powers Act" redirects here. For other uses, see War Powers Act of 1941.

War Powers Act

Full title	Joint resolution concerning the war powers of Congress and the President.
Enacted by the	93rd United States Congress
Citations
Public Law	Pub.L. 93-148
Stat.	87 Stat. 555
Codification
Legislative history
Introduced in the House as H.J.Res. 542 by Clement J. Zablocki (D-WI) on May 3, 1973 Committee consideration by: House Foreign Affairs Passed the House on July 18, 1973 (244–170) Passed the Senate on July 20, 1973 () Reported by the joint conference committee on October 4, 1973; agreed to by the Senate on October 10, 1973 (75–20) and by the House on October 12, 1973 (238–123) Vetoed by President Richard Nixon on October 24, 1973 Overridden by the House on November 7, 1973 (284–135) Overridden by the Senate and became law on November 7, 1973 (75–18)
Major amendments
Relevant Supreme Court cases

U.S. Congressional opposition to U.S. involvement in wars and interventions
1812 North America
House Federalists’ Address
1847 Mexican–American War
Spot Resolutions
1917 World War I
Filibuster of the Armed Ship Bill
1935–1939
Neutrality Acts
1935–1940
Ludlow Amendment
1970 Vietnam
McGovern–Hatfield Amendment
1970 Southeast Asia
Cooper–Church Amendment
1971 Vietnam
Repeal of Tonkin Gulf Resolution
1973 Southeast Asia
Case–Church Amendment
1973
War Powers Resolution
1974
Hughes–Ryan Amendment
1976 Angola
Clark Amendment
1982 Nicaragua
Boland Amendment
2007 Iraq
House Concurrent Resolution 63
v · d · e

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541-1548)^[1] is a federal law intended to check the power of the President in committing the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of Congress. The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution; this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."
The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto.
Despite the apparent non-ambiguity of its language, the War Powers Resolution has been regularly ignored by presidents of both parties,^[2][3] some even declaring their belief that the act is unconstitutional.^[4][5]

Contents [hide] 1 History 2 Questions regarding constitutionality 3 See also 4 Footnotes 5 References 6 External links

[edit] History

Under the United States Constitution, war powers are divided. Congress has the power to declare war, raise and support the armed forces, control the war funding (Article I, Section 8), and has "Power … to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution … all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof", while the President is commander-in-chief of the military (Article II, Section 2). It is generally agreed that the commander-in-chief role gives the President power to repel attacks against the United States and makes the President responsible for leading the armed forces.^{[citation needed]} In addition and as with all acts of the Congress, the President has the right to sign or veto congressional acts, such as a declaration of war.
During the Korean and Vietnam wars, the United States found itself involved for many years in situations of intense conflict without a declaration of war. Many members of Congress became concerned with the erosion of congressional authority to decide when the United States should become involved in a war or the use of armed forces that might lead to war. The War Powers Resolution was passed by both the House of Representatives and Senate but was vetoed by President Richard Nixon. By a two-thirds vote in each house, Congress overrode the veto and enacted the joint resolution into law on November 7, 1973.
Presidents have submitted 118 reports to Congress as a result of the War Powers Resolution, although only one (the Mayagüez incident) cited Section 4(a)(1) specifically stated that forces had been introduced into hostilities or imminent danger.
Congress invoked the War Powers Resolution in the Multinational Force in Lebanon Resolution (P.L. 98-119), which authorized the Marines to remain in Lebanon for 18 months. In addition, P.L. 102-1, authorizing the use of U.S. armed forces concerning the Iraqi aggression against Kuwait, stated that it constituted specific statutory authorization within the meaning of the War Powers Resolution.
On November 9, 1993, the House used a section of the War Powers Resolution to state that U.S. forces should be withdrawn from Somalia by March 31, 1994; Congress had already taken this action in appropriations legislation. More recently under President Clinton, war powers were at issue in former Yugoslavia; Bosnia; Kosovo; Iraq, and Haiti, and under President George W. Bush in responding to terrorist attacks against the U.S. after September 11, 2001. "[I]n 1999, President Clinton kept the bombing campaign in Kosovo going for more than two weeks after the 60-day deadline had passed. Even then, however, the Clinton legal team opined that its actions were consistent with the War Powers Resolution because Congress had approved a bill funding the operation, which they argued constituted implicit authorization. That theory was controversial because the War Powers Resolution specifically says that such funding does not constitute authorization."^[6]
After combat operations against Iraqi forces ended on February 28, 1991, the use of force to obtain Iraqi compliance with United Nations resolutions remained a war powers issue, even with the enactment of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq (P.L. 107-243), in October 2002.^[7]
May 20, 2011, marked the 60th day of US combat in Libya (as part of the UN resolution) but the deadline arrived without President Obama seeking specific authorization from the US Congress.^[8] However since the US leadership was transferred to NATO ^[9] and since US involvement is somewhat limited, President Obama had notified Congress that no authorization was needed. ^[10] On Friday, June 3, 2011, the US House of Representatives had voted to rebuke President Obama for maintaining an American presence in the NATO operations in Libya, which would be a violation of the War Powers Resolution.^[11][12]

[edit] Questions regarding constitutionality

See also: Separation of powers under the United States Constitution

The War Powers Resolution has been controversial since it became law.^[13] In passing the resolution, Congress specifically cites the Necessary and Proper Clause for its authority.^[14] Under the Necessary and Proper Clause, it is specifically provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.
Because it limits the President's authority in the use of force without an official resolution or declaration of war by Congress, there is controversy as to whether the provisions of the resolution are consistent with the Constitution. Presidents have therefore drafted reports to Congress required of the President to state that they are "consistent with" the War Powers Resolution rather than "pursuant to" so as to take into account the presidential position that the Resolution is unconstitutional.
One argument for the unconstitutionality of the War Powers Resolution by Philip Bobbitt^[15] argues "The power to make war is not an enumerated power" and the notion that to "declare" war is to "commence" war is a "contemporary textual preconception". Bobbitt contends that the Framers of the Constitution believed that statutory authorization was the route by which the United States would be committed to war, and that 'declaration' was meant for only total wars, as shown by the history of the Quasi-War with France (1798–1800). In general, constitutional powers are not so much separated as "linked and sequenced"; Congress's control over the armed forces is "structured" by appropriation, while the President commands; thus the act of declaring war should not be fetishized. Bobbitt also argues that "A democracy cannot ... tolerate secret policies" because they undermine the legitimacy of governmental action.
A second constitutionality argument concerns a possible breach of the 'separation of powers' doctrine, and whether this Resolution changes the balance between the Legislative and Executive functions. This type of constitutional controversy is similar to one that occurred under President Andrew Johnson with the Tenure of Office Act (1867). In that prior instance, the Congress passed a law (over the veto of the then-President) that required the President to secure Congressional approval for the removal of Cabinet members and other executive branch officers. The Act was not declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States until 1926^[16] ; therefore, when the Act was violated by Johnson, the House of Representatives impeached him; action in the Senate to remove him failed by one vote.
Here, the separation of powers issue is whether the War Powers Resolution requirements for Congressional approval and presidential reporting to Congress change the constitutional balance established in Articles I and II, namely that Congress is explicitly granted the sole authority to declare war, "make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces" (Article 1, Section 8), and to control the funding of those same forces, while the Executive allegedly has inherent authority as Commander in Chief. This argument does not address the other reporting requirements imposed on other executive officials and agencies by other statutes, nor does it address the provisions of Article I, Section 8 that explicitly gives Congress the authority to "make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces."
The constitution specifically states that Congress is authorized "to provide and maintain a Navy" (Article 1 Section 8). The idea of "maintenance" of a Navy implies that Naval Forces would be a permanent fixture of national defense. There is no provision in the Constitution for the maintenance of a standing Army. Provisions are made for Congress to "raise and support" land forces. "Raise" implies that the forces must be formed, or not currently in existence. The founders' strategy for national defense was based upon a bottom-up approach (armed citizenry organized into local militia) which could be federalized according to law, as prescribed in the Militia Acts of 1792. In modern circumstances the availability of a standing Army, and the President of the United States being authorized as "Commander in Chief," implies his ability as a military commander to employ forces necessary to fulfill his oath to defend the constitution.
There is also an unresolved legal question, discussed by Justice White in INS v. Chadha of whether a "key provision of the War Powers Resolution", namely 50 U.S.C. 1544(c), constitutes an improper legislative veto. (See Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, 971.) That section 1544(c) states "such forces shall be removed by the President if the Congress so directs by concurrent resolution". Justice White argues in his dissent in Chadha that, under the Chadha ruling, 1544(c) would be a violation of the Presentment Clause. The majority in Chadha does not resolve the issue. Justice White does not address or evaluate in his dissent whether that section would fall within the inherent Congressional authority under Article I Section 8 to "make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces."

[edit] See also

• War Powers Clause (of the Constitution)

[edit] Footnotes

1. ^ Full text of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C 1541–1548)
2. ^ Feldman, Noah (February 4, 2007). "Whose War Powers?". The New York Times.
3. ^ Feldman, Noah (January 8, 2006). "Our Presidential Era: Who Can Check the President?". The New York Times.
4. ^ http://www.newsweek.com/2008/07/11/wrestling-over-war-powers.html
5. ^ Rumsfeld, Donald, Known and Unknown: A Memoir, Penguin, 2011. Cf. especially Chapter 1.
6. ^ Savage, Charlie (2011-04-01) Clock Ticking on War Powers Resolution, New York Times
7. ^ 107th Congress (10 October 2002). "Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002" (text). United States Government Printing Office. Retrieved 2008-12-08.
8. ^ Libya War Deadline Arrives
9. ^ "Libya: Nato assumes control of military operation". BBC News. March 27, 2011.
10. ^ [1]
11. ^ [2]
12. ^ Steinhauer, Jennifer (June 3, 2011). "House Rebukes Obama for Continuing Libyan Mission Without Its Consent". The New York Times.
13. ^ "The war powers resolution". US Department of State Bulletin. 1988-09-15. Retrieved 2008-07-09. "The War Powers Resolution has been controversial from the day it was adopted over President Nixon's veto. Since 1973, executive officials and many Members of Congress have criticized various aspects of the resolution repeatedly."
14. ^ War Powers Joint Resolution, §2(b)
15. ^ "War Powers: An Essay on John Hart Ely's War and Responsibility: Constitutional Lessons of Vietnam and Its Aftermath," Michigan Law Quarterly 92, no. 6 (May 1994): 1364–1400
16. ^ "Myers v. United States, 272 U. S. 52 (1926)".

[edit] References

• Grimmett, Richard Z. (February 14, 2006). "CRS Report for Congress: War Powers Resolution: Presidential Compliance" (PDF). Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved 2007-09-30.
• United States Congress (November 7, 1973). "War Powers Act of 1973 (Public Law 93-148)". The Center for Regulatory Effectiveness. Retrieved 2007-09-30.
• United States Congress (October 31, 1998). "H.R.4655: Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338)". IraqWatch.org. Retrieved 2007-09-30.
• United States Congress (September 18, 2001). "Public Law 107-40: Joint Resolution: To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States (S.J. Res. 23)" (text). United States Government Printing Office. Retrieved 2007-09-30.
• United States Congress (October 16, 2002). "Public Law 107-243: Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (H. J. Res. 114)" (text). United States Government Printing Office. Retrieved 2007-09-30.
• Kinkopf, Neil. "The Congress as Surge Protector" (PDF). American Constitution Society for Law and Policy. p. 2. Retrieved 2007-09-30. "The Supreme Court has been clear and unambiguous. When Congress, acting in the vast areas of overlapping power, tells the President 'no', the President must comply."
• Doumar, Robert G. (January 8, 2003). "Hamdi v. Rumsfeld Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk (CA-02-439-2)" (PDF). USCourts.gov. United States Judiciary. Retrieved 2007-09-30.

[edit] External links

Wikisource has original text related to this article: War Powers Resolution

• Avalon Project - War Powers Resolution
• The War Powers Resolution: After Twenty-Eight Years Nov. 15, 2001 PDF
• War Powers Resolution: Presidential Compliance Sep. 11, 2001 HTML
• War Powers Resolution: Presidential Compliance Jan. 8, 2002 PDF
• War Powers Resolution : Presidential Compliance Mar. 16, 2004 PDF
• War Powers Resolution: Presidential Compliance Nov. 15, 2004 PDF
• The War Powers Resolution: After Thirty Years

Categories: Congressional opposition to the Vietnam War | United States federal defense and national security legislation | 1973 in law

The Sixth Angel 666

The sixth seal and the great earthquake

The sixth angel’s vial and The gathering of the world to battle

Revelation 16 ¹²And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared. ¹³And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.
¹⁴For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. ¹⁵Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. ¹⁶And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.
Revelation 16 ¹⁷And the seventh angel poured out his vial into the air; and there came a great voice out of the temple of heaven, from the throne, saying, It is done.
¹⁸And there were voices, and thunders, and lightnings; and there was a great earthquake, such as was not since men were upon the earth, so mighty an earthquake, and so great. ¹⁹And the great city was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell: and great Babylon came in remembrance before God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of his wrath. ²⁰And every island fled away, and the mountains were not found. ²¹And there fell upon men a great hail out of heaven, every stone about the weight of a talent: and men blasphemed God because of the plague of the hail; for the plague thereof was exceeding great.

The gathering to battle And the supper of the great God

Revelation 19 ¹¹And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. ¹²His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. ¹³And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
¹⁴And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. ¹⁵And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. ¹⁶And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS. ¹⁷And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God; ¹⁸That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great. ¹⁹And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army.
²⁰And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone. ²¹And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.

Revelation 6 ¹²And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood; ¹³And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind. ¹⁴And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places. ¹⁵And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains; ¹⁶And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb: ¹⁷For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?

The sixth angel sounding, the fear of Sharia and Islam

Although the transgressions mentioned are Judaic, Christian and Muslim, and God is above all, the fear has pervaded for years.

Revelation 9 ¹³And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden altar which is before God, ¹⁴Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates.¹⁵And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men. ¹⁶And the number of the army of the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand: and I heard the number of them. ¹⁷And thus I saw the horses in the vision, and them that sat on them, having breastplates of fire, and of jacinth, and brimstone: and the heads of the horses were as the heads of lions; and out of their mouths issued fire and smoke and brimstone. ¹⁸By these three was the third part of men killed, by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone, which issued out of their mouths. ¹⁹For their power is in their mouth, and in their tails: for their tails were like unto serpents, and had heads, and with them they do hurt. ²⁰And the rest of the men which were not killed by these plagues yet repented not of the works of their hands, that they should not worship devils, and idols of gold, and silver, and brass, and stone, and of wood: which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk: ²¹Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts.

Robert Kardashian

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This article is about the American lawyer. For the American television personality, model and Robert Kardashian's son, see Rob Kardashian.

Robert Kardashian
Born	Robert George Kardashian, February 22, 1944(1944-02-22) Los Angeles, California
Died	September 30, 2003(2003-09-30) (aged 59) Los Angeles, California
Cause of death	Esophageal cancer
Education	1966: University of Southern California (undergraduate) 1967: University of San Diego School of Law (J.D.)[1]
Occupation	Lawyer, Businessman
Known for	Lawyer in the O. J. Simpson trial
Spouse	Kris Jenner (1978-1990) Ellen Pierson (2003-death)
Children	Kourtney Kardashian (1979) Kim Kardashian (1980) Khloé Kardashian (1984) Robert Kardashian, Jr. (1987)
Relatives	Mason Disick (grandson)

Robert George Kardashian (February 22, 1944 – September 30, 2003) was an American attorney, best known as one of the attorneys for, and a friend of, O. J. Simpson.

Contents [hide] 1 Personal life 2 O. J. Simpson case 3 Death 4 References

Personal life

Robert Kardashian was of Armenian descent. He came from an upper class Armenian-American family from Los Angeles, California. Kardashian earned a Juris Doctor from the University of San Diego School of Law and practiced for about a decade; after that, he went into business. When he presented the O.J. Simpson case in 1995, it had been over 20 years since Kardashian had last practiced law.
He is the father of reality show personalities Kim, Kourtney, Khloé, and Robert Kardashian Jr., with his former wife Kris Jenner.

O. J. Simpson case

Kardashian and Simpson first met in the early 1970s and became close friends. Kardashian let his license to practice law become inactive three years before the Simpson case. He reactivated his license to aid in Simpson's defense as a volunteer assistant on his legal team. He sat by Simpson throughout the trial.^[2]
Simpson stayed in Kardashian's house during the days following the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Kardashian was the man seen carrying Simpson's garment bag the day that Simpson flew back from Chicago. Prosecutors speculated that the bag may have contained Simpson's bloody clothes or the murder weapon.
Simpson failed to turn himself in at 11 a.m. on June 17, 1994, and Kardashian read a letter by Simpson to the collected media. The letter was interpreted by many as a suicide note.^[3]

Death

Kardashian died of esophageal cancer on September 30, 2003.^[4] He was 59 years old at the time of his death. Along with his wife, ex wife, and children, he was survived by his mother and siblings.

References

1. ^ "Robert Kardashian, a Lawyer For O. J. Simpson, Dies at 59". The New York Times. 3 October 2003. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/03/us/robert-kardashian-a-lawyer-for-o-j-simpson-dies-at-59.html?scp=1&sq=robert%20kardashian%20died&st=cse. Retrieved 22 November 2010. 
2. ^ Reed, Christopher (6 October 2003). "Obituary: Robert Kardashian". The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2003/oct/06/guardianobituaries.usa. Retrieved 22 November 2010. 
3. ^ Lowry, Brian (21 June 2010). "From the couch: O.J.'s legacy continues". Fox Sports. http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/OJ-Simspons-wild-ride-continues-says-Brian-Lowry. Retrieved 22 November 2010. 
4. ^ "Former O.J. Simpson lawyer, Kardashian, dies". CNN. 1 October 2003. http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/West/10/01/OJattorney.dead/. Retrieved 22 November 2010. 

[show]v · d · eO. J. Simpson murder trial Key figures O. J. Simpson · Nicole Brown Simpson · Ronald Goldman · Al Cowlings · Lance Ito Prosecution figures Marcia Clark · Christopher Darden · Gil Garcetti Defense figures F. Lee Bailey · Johnnie Cochran · Alan Dershowitz · Carl Douglas · Robert Kardashian · Barry Scheck · Robert Shapiro Witnesses Traci Adell · Michael Baden · Denise Brown · Pablo Fenjves · Mark Fuhrman · Fred Goldman · Kato Kaelin · Henry Lee · Faye Resnick Other elements Brentwood · Bruno Magli · Centinela Avenue · Ford Bronco · Fuhrman tapes · If I Did It · American Tragedy (film)

[show]v · d · eThe Kardashian Family Family members Robert Kardashian • Kris Jenner • Bruce Jenner • Kourtney Kardashian • Kim Kardashian • Khloé Kardashian Odom • Rob Kardashian • Kendall Jenner • Kylie Jenner Television series Keeping Up with the Kardashians (2007–present) • Kourtney and Khloé Take Miami (2009–present) • Kourtney and Kim Take New York (2011–present) • Khloé & Lamar (April 2011)

Persondata
Name	Kardashian, Robert
Alternative names
Short description
Date of birth	February 22, 1944
Place of birth	Los Angeles, California
Date of death	September 30, 2003
Place of death	Los Angeles, California

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kardashian"

View page ratings

Rate this page

Rate this page

Page ratings

What's this?

Current average ratings.

Trustworthy

Objective

Complete

Well-written

I am highly knowledgeable about this topic (optional)

I have a relevant college/university degree

It is part of my profession

It is a deep personal passion

The source of my knowledge is not listed here

I would like to help improve Wikipedia, send me an e-mail (optional)

We will send you a confirmation e-mail. We will not share your address with anyone. (Privacy policy)

Saved successfully

Your ratings have not been submitted yet

Your ratings have expired

Please reevaluate this page and submit new ratings.

An error has occured. Please try again later.

Thanks! Your ratings have been saved.

Please take a moment to complete a short survey.

Thanks! Your ratings have been saved.

Did you want to create an account?

An account will help you track your edits, get involved in discussions, and be a part of the community.

or

Thanks! Your ratings have been saved.

Did you know that you can edit this page?

Categories: 1944 births | 2003 deaths | American people of Armenian descent | Burials at Inglewood Park Cemetery | California lawyers | Cancer deaths in California | Deaths from esophageal cancer | Kardashian family | O. J. Simpson murder case | People from Los Angeles, California | University of San Diego School of Law alumni | University of Southern California alumni